Skip to content

Eight sub-competencies

Pondara measures capability along eight action-grounded dimensions. Every engagement contributes evidence to the dimensions a scenario exercises — never to all eight equally — and the learner’s profile is the running aggregate of those contributions.

The eight dimensions

#Name (EN)Name (DE)Name (ES)What it measures
1Domain knowledgeFachwissenConocimiento del campoDeclarative knowledge of facts, concepts, standards, and procedures specific to the field.
2Procedural skillVerfahrenskompetenzHabilidad procedimentalPractised execution of techniques and procedures — the doing, not the knowing.
3Situational awarenessSituationswahrnehmungConciencia situacionalReading the context: noticing what matters, what changed, what is missing or unsaid.
4Decision-makingEntscheidungskompetenzToma de decisionesChoosing among alternatives under uncertainty, time pressure, or competing values.
5CommunicationKommunikationskompetenzComunicaciónCalibrated verbal and non-verbal interaction with the relevant interlocutor.
6Self-regulationSelbstregulationAutorregulaciónManaging attention, emotion, and energy under stress and across time.
7ReflectionReflexionskompetenzReflexiónMetacognition: extracting lessons from action, articulating reasoning, identifying one’s own gaps.
8CollaborationKollaborationskompetenzColaboraciónCoordinating with peers, supervisors, and AI assistants in shared workflows.

How they map to existing models

The eight cover the three foundational disciplines named in the whitepaper:

  • Cognitive science — dimensions 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 (knowledge representation, procedural memory, situated cognition, decision theory, metacognition).
  • Memory research — dimensions 1 (declarative / long-lasting), 2 (procedural memory), 7 (metamemory).
  • Personality psychology — dimensions 5, 6, 8 (communication style, self-regulation as a Big-Five-derived construct, prosocial coordination).

They map to the KMK Handlungskompetenz taxonomy without an orphan:

KMK macroCovered by
Fachkompetenz (technical)1, 2
Methodenkompetenz (method)3, 4, 7
Sozialkompetenz (social)5, 8
Selbstkompetenz (self)6, 7

Reflection (7) deliberately spans Methoden- and Selbstkompetenz — it is the bridge that makes situated learning work.

Dreyfus bands

Internally each dimension is a number 0–100. For display we use the Dreyfus skill-acquisition bands, which are the lingua franca of skill-level talk in nursing, aviation, and trades — Pondara’s most likely early customer fields.

BandRange
Novice0–20
Advanced beginner21–40
Competent41–60
Proficient61–80
Expert81–100

Bands appear in copy; the underlying number is shown on hover for learners and trainers who want it.

Weights

Each scenario authored by a field expert declares:

  • a required vector — which dimensions the scenario exercises and at what target level, and
  • an evidence weight — how strongly an engagement in this scenario contributes to each dimension’s evidence.

A customer-conversation scenario weights Communication, Situational Awareness, and Decision-Making heavily and Domain Knowledge lightly. A technical-inspection scenario inverts those. Forcing equal weights would dilute evidence; the matrix is part of the scenario, not a platform constant.

Target vector

Each scenario declares a target level per dimension it exercises. Your radar overlays your current level against this target so you can see at a glance which dimensions still need more practice. The target vector is not a pass/fail line — it is the shape of competent performance for this scenario in this field.

Why eight, not six or twelve

  • Six collapses Communication into Collaboration or Reflection into Self-Regulation; both cost interpretability.
  • Twelve over-fits to specific fields and breaks portability — Pondara is multi-field by design.
  • Eight is the smallest mutually-exclusive partition that covers the KMK macros and the three foundational disciplines, and it is the number Mike specified in the whitepaper.